Audit the claim your brand actually makes.
Supplier data is only half the exposure. We test the public wording, evidence coverage and substantiation behind a brand's environmental statement — before a customer, regulator or claimant does.
A public claim is a legal artefact, not a mood
“Low carbon”, “climate neutral”, “sustainable” and “net-zero supply chain” each require different evidence. We make that difference visible.
Claim register
Capture packaging, product pages, campaigns, tenders and investor statements in one inventory.
Evidence coverage
Map every material assertion to a batch record, factor, boundary and method version.
Substantiation review
Re-derive calculations, test exclusions and identify claims that outrun the evidence.
Qualified wording
Recommend narrower, evidence-faithful language or record a refusal to support the claim.
Built for legal and sustainability teams together
- Claim-by-claim substantiation matrix
- Evidence coverage and missing-data register
- Re-derived calculations and canonical record references
- Qualified wording recommendations
- Residual exposure and refusal record
- Annual refresh for material campaigns
We provide technical and evidence assurance, not legal advice. Counsel remains responsible for jurisdiction-specific legal conclusions.
Annual or claim-level
- Product-level and campaign environmental claims
- Evidence gaps behind “net zero” and similar wording
- Pre-publication technical review
- Post-challenge evidence reconstruction
- Immunity from challenge, enforcement or litigation
- Legal sign-off in any jurisdiction
- Certification of the whole company
- Approval wording disconnected from evidence